 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blog Entry# 4347244
Posted: Jun 19 2019 (19:42)
12 Responses
Last Response: Nov 12 (01:26)
12 Responses
Last Response: Nov 12 (01:26)
#Eligibility
Do you think there should be a minimum cut off distance for Super fast trains? For example, if I say "Minimum cut off should be 300KM" then it means a train SHOULD NOT be declared as Super fast if it travels less than 300KM even though it fulfills the SF criteria of 55KMPH Avg speed.
*****************
The main reason behind this poll...
more...
Do you think there should be a minimum cut off distance for Super fast trains? For example, if I say "Minimum cut off should be 300KM" then it means a train SHOULD NOT be declared as Super fast if it travels less than 300KM even though it fulfills the SF criteria of 55KMPH Avg speed.
*****************
The main reason behind this poll...
more...
NO vote
I don't have any issue with current situation
58%
28
I don't have any issue till the trains are punctual
13%
6
Minimum 200KM
2%
1
Minimum 250KM
2%
1
Minimum 300KM
15%
7
Minimum 350KM
0%
0
Minimum 400KM
0%
0
Minimum 450KM
0%
0
Minimum 500KM
6%
3
Can't say
0%
0
Amy other opinion (Please comment)
4%
2
7 Posts
I don't have any issues with the distance or the number of stoppages, only thing is the minimum average speed must be at least 70 kmph.
May be. But the fact is we hold on to 55 kmph for a very long time. What is needed is the development of rail infrastructure and increase the speed of trains. IMO, 70 kmph can be set as a minimum benchmark to start with. 55 kmph is too low.
Travel SAFE
1. RailFanning does NOT MEAN dangerous pics/videos.
2. Doorplating pics/youtube videos are strictly FORBIDDEN in IRI.
3. Take plenty of food pics and other safe pics.
4. Write human interest narratives to make the pics interesting.
5. Enjoy blogging and travelling SAFELY.
REMEMBER: YOUR LIFE is the most precious thing, NOT RailFanning.
Scroll to Top