Indian Railway Forum - 3 - Railway Enquiry

Re# 1555744-6

@1555744-5 @SRG^~

Exp trains can run....why only passenger trains be cancelled?
Is the question...

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

32211 views

Aug 03 2015 (16:55)

Re# 1555744-8

@1555744-7 @SRG^~

question cheyatam imp......anthe......
Apposition vundali kada

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

General Travel

17703 views

Jul 19 2015 (21:02) 11031/Solapur - Vijayapura Express

~ 628 blog posts

Entry# 1545430 Tags

the new born crap is the result of this :p

1 Public Posts - Tue Jul 21, 2015

3 Public Posts - Wed Jul 29, 2015

1012 views

Jul 29 2015 (18:06)

Re# 1545430-5

@1545430-4 @SunilKulkarni~

Happily they should have washed hands by giving it to GR and SWR

1 Public Posts - Wed Jul 29, 2015

981 views

Jul 29 2015 (20:30)

Re# 1545430-7

@1545430-6 @sachinature~

Its really a good thing in KA point if GR gets pitline and Bidar gets pit line
its much beter than SWR progress i feel
I agree GR fight a lot for Pitline and division

1 Public Posts - Wed Jul 29, 2015

1180 views

Jul 30 2015 (08:58)

Re# 1545430-9 Past Edits

@1545430-8 @~

Present this train is maintained at SUR
What facilities does BJP/BGK have to maintain this rake?
Then how can we expect CSTM -SUR exp to extend to BJP/BGK except maintenance is shifted to CSTM.
This is running in good slot now and presently the CC is very less,maybe SUR did not find the demand to increase the CC in that case whats wrong if...
more...

2 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

1128 views

Jul 30 2015 (10:29)

Re# 1545430-12 Past Edits

@1545430-11 @sachinature~

Then if it is not going to take time to create pitline at BGK/BJP they who/What is stoping SWR to do to create one?
If there is pitline then noo need to beg CR for extension of CSTM-SUR exp,SWR can starts its own rake

1 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

1114 views

Jul 30 2015 (10:36)

Re# 1545430-14

@1545430-13 @sachinature~

2 points here
1 is pit line at BJP/BGK
2 Insted of bi weekly they should have extended to GR/Bidar afterPitline operational
If BJP/BGK has pitline i would have asked to extend to BJP/BGK than GR/Bidar

2 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

1021 views

Jul 30 2015 (12:20)

Re# 1545430-17 Past Edits

@1545430-16 @SunilKulkarni~

One at BAY and One at BJP/BGK is my dream
I dont know howSWR justyfy themelves for not planning pitlines
Did UBL got pitlines in SCR or SWR rule

3 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

1053 views

Jul 30 2015 (13:04)

Re# 1545430-21

@1545430-20 @sachinature~

We are not asking to extend every train...if we take such polocy i can ask extension to HYB/SBC/MAS/TPTY/CAPE also...that looks foolish.
Try to understand why asking or extension of this train i.e CSTM-SUR express only.
reason using good slot with less CC,for that good slot a train having 20+ CC will help more pax to reach early morning to Mumbai.
SUR did not find...
more...

1024 views

Jul 30 2015 (13:24)

Re# 1545430-22 Past Edits

@1545430-19 @sachinature~

How can you say pitline isnot issue here...
If you file a PG or RTI for extension of CSTM-SUR exp to BJP/BGK the immedeate reply u get is lack or infra to maintain a rake at BJP/BGK
If the rake is maintained at SUR then how can you say that Pit line is not a prob for BJP/BGK to extend

1 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

944 views

Jul 30 2015 (13:44)

Re# 1545430-24

@1545430-23 @SunilKulkarni~

Now they say GR connected with X pair of trains and this year we introduced Y pair of trains and introducing trains is ongoing process.
When will our fate changes with this copy paste replies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

948 views

Jul 30 2015 (14:14)

Re# 1545430-26

@1545430-25 @sachinature~

Can you expalin what you are trying to say
We are not against SUR-BJP exp......but against using this rake,why cant CR arrange a 10 Genral coaches.
This week end exp has blocked the future possible extension to GR/Bidar/BJP//BGK

2 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

1010 views

Jul 30 2015 (14:22)

Re# 1545430-29

@1545430-28 @sachinature~

Extension of CSTM-SUR to BJPis not technically possible bcz its primary maintenance is SUR...if extended toBJP/BGK where will it maintain?
Show me what are the examples you have.
If that is case then why SWR not terminating or orginating UBL-LTT weekly via BJP from BAY instead of UBLonly?
I clearly said CSTM-SUR exp is maintained at SUR

2 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

1094 views

Jul 30 2015 (15:39)

Re# 1545430-32 Past Edits

@1545430-31 @sachinature~

The Train no it self says it belongs to SUR div
Its maintenance is SUR,if this base is CSTMi would have kept a leter long back to extend this till GDG/RC
and on Sat and sunday it will have only secondary maintenance after coming from CSTM it has 2 hrs time before it begins journey as weekend expand after coming from BJP it has 2 hrs time to start journey to CSTM
All...
more...

1 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

925 views

Jul 30 2015 (15:55)

Re# 1545430-34 Past Edits

@1545430-33 @sachinature~

Its in hands of CR
It is very well know how CR(Bombay div) replies if we ask to shift maintenance from SUR
I dont want to waste time in those copy paste replies,as i has seen many such earlier.

1 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

1046 views

Jul 30 2015 (16:04)

Re# 1545430-36 Past Edits

@1545430-35 @sachinature~

Try to understand SUR attitude towards GR
If you ask for extension of CSTM-SUR to GR or Bidar now the reply is no pitline facilities
And if you ask the same question after Bidar or GR pitline operational the reply is the rake is used as bi weekly train between SUR-BJP so extension to GR/Bidar is not possible.

1 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

981 views

Jul 30 2015 (16:14)

Re# 1545430-38

@1545430-37 @sachinature~

that is why i said CR cant run a train with 10 General coaches....why this rake only needed?
There it self the answer is
If BJP would have Pitline the point of asking might be diff

1 Public Posts - Thu Jul 30, 2015

978 views

Jul 30 2015 (17:01)

Re# 1545430-40

@1545430-39 @sachinature~

Can i know what pressure u can put and what you can achieve by GR div in SWR?
What benfit do GR or SWR get by new div GR?

1 Public Posts - Fri Jul 31, 2015

1029 views

Jul 31 2015 (10:34)

Re# 1545430-42

@1545430-41 @sachinature~

If CR is prob for VSG train then why SWR not agreeing for KCG-VSG weekly?

1022 views

Jul 31 2015 (10:36)

Re# 1545430-43

@1545430-41 @sachinature~

GR-BAY ICE
its not so easy as this ICE has to move in SWR-SCR-SWR with reversal at GTL
more or less the TT and CC will be like SUR-UBL exp only

1 Public Posts - Fri Jul 31, 2015

1200 views

Jul 31 2015 (11:21)

Re# 1545430-45

@1545430-44 @sachinature~

SCR is not cancelling the slip to VSG bcz there is no direct connection to VSG,once SWR agrees for weekly KCG-VSG exp then SCR ready to cancel the slip and SER ready to augment 18047.
First let SWR accept vsg train then automatically SCR cancel the slip...there is diff between by statement and your statement.
What coordination do SER/SCR do for geting clreaence from SWR?
What...
more...

2 Public Posts - Fri Jul 31, 2015

848 views

Jul 31 2015 (13:31)

Re# 1545430-48

@1545430-47 @sachinature~

Now why are not they agreeing for KCG-VSG with SCR rake?

960 views

Jul 31 2015 (13:32)

Re# 1545430-49

@1545430-47 @sachinature~

SWR dont have control over link...but the route of UBL-VSG is controlled by SWR right then why are they not allowing KCG-VSG weekly which automatically makes SCR to cancel the slip.

994 views

Jul 31 2015 (13:34)

Re# 1545430-50

@1545430-46 @CoringaExpress~

Its problem of SWR,VSG is in SWR and UBL-HYB exp is SWR train
then what stoping them and what in future allow them to make VSG-SC daily or VSG-GR?

1 Public Posts - Fri Jul 31, 2015

996 views

Jul 31 2015 (14:39)

Re# 1545430-52 Past Edits

@1545430-51 @sachinature~

Proposal beeing sent from the time when Mr Dinesh Trivedi is RM till now it is 4 times i guess only for KCG-VSG just weekly
Yes proposal sent to KCG-MAJN via UBL but SWR rejected so requested SR to give path via CBE....got succeed.

974 views

Jul 31 2015 (14:43)

Re# 1545430-53 Past Edits

@1545430-51 @sachinature~

So as per you till now there were no proposals at all in Londa-VSG route bcz no trains been announced in past budjets except 1 or 2.
So leave abt SCR....did not SWR find a demand to run VSG-SBC/MYS

3 Public Posts - Fri Jul 31, 2015

978 views

Jul 31 2015 (14:56)

Re# 1545430-57

@1545430-54 @sachinature~

So u want to say train should not run? is it fault decession of SCR?
SCR first proposed KCG-MAQ via UBL-MAO but SWR rejected ..... so SCR should sit idle by saying SWR rejected?
After SWR rejected the next option is via CBE...so tried and got train.....wither it is longer or shorter train is imp for many pax...
FFI SCR prposed both train...
more...

947 views

Jul 31 2015 (14:58)

Re# 1545430-58

@1545430-56 @SparshSaxena~

it is nothing new i to aware of...but the blooger is in feel that SCR has not sent proposal KCG-VSG and he is feeling VSG-GR is possible bcz GR is in SWR.
Untill and unless the prob of LD-VSG route is solved no expectations for GR/MAQ/UBL that blooger should understand

1 Public Posts - Fri Jul 31, 2015

1 Public Posts - Sat Aug 01, 2015

865 views

Aug 01 2015 (14:49)

Re# 1545430-61

@1545430-60 @sachinature~

Yes it is new div effect and it is not bcz of CR or SWR ok where GR got pit line
Then what stopping SWR to have pit line at BJP/BGK/BAY?
I am sorry to say this you are wrong SWR rejected,may be u may not accept it but it is fact
Ok lets assume that SWR has no prob to run a train...
more...

848 views

Aug 01 2015 (14:55)

Re# 1545430-62 Past Edits

@1545430-60 @sachinature~

And for your info KCG-MAQ trains is not only for MAQ pass...
It is SCR train and this is the only train giving KCG/KRNT/HX-SA/CBE/SRR/CLT/CAN/MAQ. which is more useful for AP state/telugu people.
If KCG-MAQ is via UBL/MAO/MAQ then it just gives connection to KCG and benfits people of KCG,UBL,MAQ and MAQ why should SCR think of only KCG?

1 Public Posts - Sun Aug 02, 2015

2 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

1227 views

Aug 03 2015 (09:42)

Re# 1545430-66

@1545430-64 @sachinature~

Its better u be in u r world and enjoy blaming SR/SCR

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

1074 views

Aug 03 2015 (10:44)

Re# 1545430-69 Past Edits

@1545430-67 @sachinature~

Good and Bad depends upon our perception,it varies form person to person
Here i am not to certify good or bad...and never said that SCR is Good and wont say in future too.
Good can never be possible

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

1014 views

Aug 03 2015 (11:20)

Re# 1545430-71

@1545430-70 @sachinature~

its beter to rely again on KA HC for
pilines at BJP/BGK/BAY
New train to UBL-MAQ
Weekly train to VSG from KCG
And many more

2 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

926 views

Aug 03 2015 (12:39)

Re# 1545430-75

@1545430-74 @12YEARSINIRI^~

SWR has int to run spl from SBC to PVR bi weekly,UBL-MAS Bi weekly spl
But why not SBC-VSG weekly and SBC-PVR weekly with same rake and UBL-MAS weekly nd UBL-MAQ weekly with same rake
Why cant UBL-SC be modified as VSG-SC

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

862 views

Aug 03 2015 (12:58)

Re# 1545430-77

@1545430-76 @12YEARSINIRI^~

Its not only SWR every zone targest income.....bcz IR know how much goods revenue is imp....
Even during godavari pushkaralu time when the trains were running 7 to 15 hrs delay also SCR did not cancelled goods trains.
And many saying SWR can be controlled by KA HC...but that can only in once case where there is HMRDA agreemet...the Same HC cant inolve in SWR decessions.
SCR...
more...

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

838 views

Aug 03 2015 (13:38)

Re# 1545430-79

@1545430-78 @sachinature~

Who made those ghat restrections?
What are the Ghat restrections?

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

742 views

Aug 03 2015 (13:47)

Re# 1545430-81

@1545430-80 @12YEARSINIRI^~

i too know it......Agrees KA is shared by 5 zones,and i too know SWR has its own problems but not even single step is taken come out of all those hurdles.
I am a fan of SWR personelly than SCR just bcz of location and closeness to UBL.
SWR may be recently born...but it is not born with empty hands that others should agree.
I...
more...

2 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

764 views

Aug 03 2015 (13:58)

Re# 1545430-84 Past Edits

@1545430-82 @12YEARSINIRI^~

And SCR proposed a train to VSG/MAO in diff ways
they MAQ bi weekly via MAO it is rejected
And prev 17003 HYB-KOP scr train is tri weekly SCR proposed another tri weekly from HYB-VSG in same slot instead of KOP daily but rejected so HYB-KOP became daily.
And form the info i have when SCR asked SWR for VSG trains they suggested via...
more...

2 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

904 views

Aug 03 2015 (14:03)

Re# 1545430-87

@1545430-85 @12YEARSINIRI^~

As i travel to goa once or twice a year in a group the following is the trains generally prefered
KCG-VSG slip directly to VSG or prasanti nilayam exp upto GTL from there 18047 due to less no of availabilties in slip exp
and retun by 18048 from vsg to LD by taking general tkt(booking is not allowed) and from Londa we take KOP-HYB daily.

2 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

1257 views

Aug 03 2015 (14:59)

Re# 1545430-90

@1545430-89 @sachinature~

Find the diff between Railways for profit and railways only for freight profit.
Every zone has goods trains along with passenger carrying trains is SWR only for Freight?

2 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

1283 views

Aug 03 2015 (15:27)

Re# 1545430-93

@1545430-92 @LHB_for_18047~

So SWR only wants money coming from freight
SWR only wants to recieve trains of other zones and clean there floors and send them back via SBC/UBL only.
Polticians dont speak and say State govt is bad in supporting railway projects....
Till now all the Parties have ruled KA after zone formation?

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

1380 views

Aug 03 2015 (15:32)

Re# 1545430-95

@1545430-91 @sachinature~

Agreed SWR is less in doubling...
But is it not geting pofits for improving infra facilities?
is doubling needed to construct pitlines?
If MAS-UBL spl possible
YPR-PVR spl possible
And...
more...

13 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

9 Public Posts - Tue Aug 04, 2015

9 Public Posts - Wed Aug 05, 2015

2 Public Posts - Thu Aug 06, 2015

Info Update

7830 views

★

Aug 02 2015 (08:43) DDS/Dudh Sagar (1 PFs)

S_V_Iyer^~

S_V_Iyer^~ 18234 blog posts

Entry# 1555808 Tags

Its Official Now....
Dudhsagar Waterfalls closed for public in Monsoons where the only way to visit is 'trekking via tracks'

Source: Times of India, Goa Edition
Date:- 02/08/2015

7 Public Posts - Sun Aug 02, 2015

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

2266 views

Aug 03 2015 (11:02)

Re# 1555808-9

@1555808-8 @12YEARSINIRI^~

All these are badly needed for South indian - Goa connection
But nothing will come on tracks in nearby future

1 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

1 Public Posts - Tue Aug 04, 2015

PREDICTIONS: 14
confirm: 93%
rac: 0%
wl: 7%

Journey: Sun Aug 02, 2015
Dep: TPTY/Tirupati @ 17:15 PF#: 1
Arr: RJY/Rajahmundry @ 04:18 +1 night
Distance: 564 km / 951 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl-0012# | Charting @13:15

17209/Seshadri Express (PT)
PNR: 430-xxxxxxx | Similar PNRs
Entry# 1546283

NO PENDING REQUEST

Posted: Jul 20 2015 (20:15:09) View Posted Status

Latest Status: Aug 02 2015 (20:08:34)

Passenger 1: S4,13 [MB] (Booking Status: W/L 42,RLGN)
Chart PREPARED

1 Public Posts - Sun Aug 02, 2015

907 views

Aug 02 2015 (17:56)

Re# 1546283-2

@1546283-1 @guest

Happy Journey

13 Public Posts - Sun Aug 02, 2015

12 Public Posts - Mon Aug 03, 2015

General Travel

3204 views

Aug 02 2015 (17:10) 17411/Mahalaxmi Express (PT)

Explorer~

Explorer~ 2173 blog posts

Entry# 1556115 Tags

On what criteria decides train belongs to that particular zone....
Maharalaxmi running in CR....but it share the rakes with haripriya exp....that's why its shows belongs to SCR..?

2497 views

Aug 02 2015 (17:16)

Re# 1556115-1

@1556115-0 @Explorer~

its mutual agreement between 2 zones CR and SCR

1 Public Posts - Sun Aug 02, 2015

2516 views

Aug 02 2015 (17:25)

Re# 1556115-3

@1556115-2 @Explorer~

Primary maintenance at TPTY and Secondary mainenance at KOP i dnt have idea abt mainenance a CSTM,harldy at CSTM waterfilling and floor cleaning could be done