has has [i mean hassan has] terminating trains. if mas sklr is the concern, then mas sklr can be a train, if mas sbhr is the concern it can be a mas maq train put to sbhr,
my point is the complexity and problems associated with the sbhr sklr ghats, wherein limited train can only ply.
second is mas maq side doesnt have any much demand. agreed maq is kind of being dumped upon by kerala trains but sadly, maq is bounded by the sbhr sklr ghats on one side and second...
more... path is qlm clr which also has restrictions. if today a train is started via sbhr sklr towards mas and regularised, it indirectly brings us to a conclusion that it could have been utilized for a maq sbc or karnataka connection. i mean maq needs karnataka connection more than chennai, which is kind of empty despite being well connected. now if sklr or sbhr has a demand why should it ply only via the ghat is the question, it can be done by for example putting sbc mas mail to sklr [cutting rsa of karnataka] if needed.
the ghats is the crucial point here.