No offense but I'm still trying to figure out how tf is your message related to my post, you're trying to prove that VBs are useful and I never said that they're not useful. I agree with you that VBs are useful, you and anyone can go check out my previous posts where I've appreciated VBs which run on full occupancy and are hit.
My whole point in my post was that the fact that "SL and GS are solely pushing Railways into loss" Is just pure bullshit because political VBs...
more... are also making loss, running at really low occupancy - are basically white elephants. The point that SL and GS are the only reason for IR making loss is usually pushed by the boot lickers of certain political party.
The fact that Indian Railways is loss maker, it lies into the political nature of Railways more so than any exclusive class like unnecessary halts/trains etc, that was what my point was and you missed it out.
please wait...Translate to EnglishDude, no disrespect, but I'm still trying to get how the heck your message fits with my post. You're all about VBs being handy, and I never said they weren't. I totally dig that VBs have their place, you can peep my earlier posts where I've given props to VBs that stay packed and are on point. My post's main vibe was calling out that blaming "SL and GS for Railway losses" is total crap. 'Cause even political VBs are in the red, barely anyone riding - just big white elephants. Saying SL and GS alone are bleeding IR dry is just what the lick-ups of a certain party keep pushing. Indian Railways being in the red, it's more about the political scene with Railways than just extra stops/trains, and that's what I was getting at, man.