 |
|
Timeline of all Site Edits
Filters:
Page# 1 Timeline Updates
Entry# 6380922 Blog Entry# 5985303
by: AZT~ 377 Conf TLs 23 Void TLs
ICF Rake; LOCO SLR GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN D4 D3 D2 D1 C1 GEN GEN SLR
Past Edits
Updated: Mar 03 (09:23) by AZT~
Confirmed: Mar 03 (12:24) by AvradipTMZ^~
ICF Rake; LOCO SLR GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN D4 D3 D2 D1 C1 GEN GEN SLR
Rake Notes: D1 to D4 are reserved coaches.
Rake Notes: D1 to D4 are reserved coaches.
Updated: Mar 02 (22:28) by AZT~
ICF Rake; LOCO SLR GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN D2 D1 C1 GEN GEN SLR
Rake Notes:
Rake Notes:
ICF Rake; LOCO SLR GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN GEN D2 C1 D1 GEN GEN SLR
1 Posts
Please remove the unnecessary rake notes. It is well understood that the coaches with D markings are reserved ones.
Looks like you haven't travelled in this route yet. Even the GS coaches mentioned here have the D numbering. Like D5-D13. But they are counted under unreserved coaches.
And looks like, you didn't get my point. Let me explain it again. I know very well, that not only in SBC - MYS route, but in many other routes in India, the same tradition is followed (i.e. coaches are marked as D, but they serve as UR GEN). But my point is, when you have mentioned other D-marked unreserved coaches as GEN and only those 4 reserved coaches as D1-D4, when what is the point in writing the rake notes in extra? It is already visible that those 4 coaches will be reserved only. Understood? Now, please do the needful.
Page# 1 Timeline Updates
Scroll to Top